Noida Toll Bridge Company Limited (NOIDATOLL) has unveiled its Q1 FY25 financial results, and the headline is a striking shift from deep red to a healthy green on the profit ledger. For a company that has navigated a prolonged legal battle over its core revenue stream, this turnaround is certainly an eye-catcher. But as expert financial analysts, we know to look beyond the surface. Is this a true operational revival or an accounting maneuver? Let’s dive in.
NOIDATOLL reported a standalone Net Profit of Rs. 416.65 lakhs for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 (Q1 FY25), a stark contrast to the Rs. (538.51) lakhs loss in the corresponding quarter last year. The consolidated figures echo this positive shift, showing a Net Profit of Rs. 413.91 lakhs compared to a loss of Rs. (531.10) lakhs in Q1 FY24. Earnings Per Share (EPS) also flipped from negative Rs. (0.29) to a positive Rs. 0.22.
Such a dramatic swing begs the question: what changed?
Let’s first glance at the top line, Revenue from Operations:
Particulars | Q1 FY25 (Unaudited) | Q4 FY24 (Audited) | Q1 FY24 (Unaudited) | Change QoQ (%) | Change YoY (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue from Operations | 1,052.02 | 1,043.79 | 1,000.34 | +0.79% | +5.17% |
Other Income | 55.99 | 49.97 | 65.74 | +12.04% | -14.70% |
Total Income | 1,108.01 | 1,093.76 | 1,066.08 | +1.30% | +3.93% |
Figures in Rs. Lakhs (Standalone)
Revenue from operations for Q1 FY25 saw a modest 5.17% increase year-on-year (YoY) and a marginal 0.79% increase quarter-on-quarter (QoQ). This indicates that the company’s income, primarily derived from non-toll bridge operations (like advertising, property rentals, etc., since toll collection stopped), remains largely stable. There’s no significant surge in core activity, but crucially, no decline either, demonstrating resilience despite the core business challenge.
The true hero of this quarter’s profitability isn’t surging revenue; it’s a dramatic reining in of expenses.
Particulars | Q1 FY25 (Unaudited) | Q4 FY24 (Audited) | Q1 FY24 (Unaudited) | Change QoQ (%) | Change YoY (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating Expenses | 581.03 | 581.90 | 560.64 | -0.15% | +3.64% |
Employee Benefits Expense | 11.45 | 11.12 | 26.83 | +2.97% | -57.32% |
Finance Costs | - | 0.06 | 0.06 | -100.00% | -100.00% |
Depreciation and Amortization Expense | 15.79 | 15.02 | 938.18 | +5.13% | -98.31% |
Other Expenses | 83.09 | 76.16 | 78.88 | +9.09% | +5.34% |
Total Expenses | 691.36 | 684.26 | 1,604.59 | +1.04% | -56.91% |
Figures in Rs. Lakhs (Standalone)
The most eye-popping change is the Depreciation and Amortization (D&A) Expense. It plummeted from a whopping Rs. 938.18 lakhs in Q1 FY24 to just Rs. 15.79 lakhs in Q1 FY25 – a staggering 98.31% reduction! This single factor is the primary driver behind the company’s return to profitability.
Why such a drastic drop in D&A? This directly stems from the Supreme Court’s decision on December 20, 2024, which dismissed the company’s appeal to restart user fee collection on the NOIDA bridge. As a direct consequence, the company was forced to impair its intangible asset (the right to collect user fees) in the previous fiscal year (FY25). This was recorded as an “Exceptional Item” of Rs. 23,249.70 lakhs for the year ended March 31, 2025.
What does this mean for Q1 FY25? After the impairment, the carrying value of this intangible asset is significantly reduced, leading to a minuscule depreciation charge moving forward. So, while the impairment itself was a massive one-time hit in the prior year, its aftermath is a permanently lower D&A expense, fundamentally altering NOIDATOLL’s cost structure and turning losses into profits.
Beyond D&A, other expenses show some interesting trends:
Overall, the dramatic reduction in D&A, combined with some efforts in employee cost management, has slashed total expenses by almost 57% YoY, paving the way for the reported profit.
A crucial element impacting NOIDATOLL’s reported profitability is the complete absence of Finance Costs in Q1 FY25. This isn’t because the company has paid off all its loans. Instead, it’s due to a moratorium on interest payments imposed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) as part of the IL&FS resolution process.
The company has not provisioned for interest on loans from ICICI Bank and IL&FS Transportation Networks. For Q1 FY25 alone, this unprovided interest amounts to Rs. 292.85 lakhs, and cumulatively, it stands at Rs. 7,368.53 lakhs (approx. Rs. 73.68 crores) up to June 30, 2025.
The Impact: If NOIDATOLL were required to accrue and pay this interest, the reported profit of Rs. 416.65 lakhs would be significantly lower, potentially even turning back into a loss. While this NCLAT moratorium provides substantial relief and boosts current profitability, it’s a temporary measure. Investors must watch this closely, as the lifting of this moratorium could drastically alter the company’s financial health.
NOIDATOLL’s journey has been heavily influenced by legal outcomes:
NOIDATOLL’s Q1 FY25 results present a complex picture. The company has technically turned around its profitability, but this is overwhelmingly an accounting-driven recovery due to asset impairment rather than a surge in operational performance from its core business.
Outlook:
Company Classification: Given its history and the nature of the profit turnaround, NOIDATOLL can be best classified as a “Turnaround” company, albeit one whose turnaround is largely a result of an accounting adjustment following a critical legal defeat, rather than a significant operational pivot. It also embodies characteristics of an “Asset Play”, where the underlying asset (the bridge) continues to exist, but its value and income generation are tied to a complex web of legal and regulatory outcomes. Investors in NOIDATOLL are essentially betting on the long-term resolution of its legacy issues and its ability to generate residual value from its assets.
The Q1 FY25 results mark a new chapter for NOIDATOLL, one where the financial statements finally reflect the reality of its operating model post-toll collection. The path ahead will be about consistent, albeit modest, profitability and diligent management of its remaining legal and financial obligations.