Tokyo Plast International Limited’s (TOKYOPLAST) results for Q2 FY25 present a challenging picture. While the first half of the year (H1 FY25) shows a respectable 8% growth in sales compared to last year, the story for the second quarter is one of stagnation and severe margin pressure. Revenue for Q2 saw a slight year-on-year (YoY) dip, but the real concern lies in the profitability, with Profit After Tax (PAT) plummeting by over 53%.
This sharp decline isn’t just about a single bad quarter; it’s a symptom of escalating costs and potential working capital stress. As we dig deeper, we find that the company’s ability to convert profits into cash has also weakened significantly. For investors, the key question is whether this is a temporary hiccup or the beginning of a more worrying trend, especially with potential global headwinds on the horizon.
At first glance, the sales figures don’t ring major alarm bells, but they do signal a loss of momentum.
Metric (in ₹ Lakhs) | Q2 FY25 | Q1 FY25 | Q2 FY24 | YoY Change | QoQ Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenue | 1,846.62 | 1,779.84 | 1,896.05 | -2.6% |
+3.8% |
The company operates in a single segment, “Plastic Thermoware Products.” Without a breakdown of volume versus price growth, it’s difficult to ascertain the true health of the top line. However, the inability to grow in the recent quarter suggests either waning demand or intense competition.
The most alarming part of the Q2 results is the dramatic collapse in profitability. The company has failed to protect its margins in the face of rising costs.
Metric (in ₹ Lakhs) | Q2 FY25 | Q2 FY24 | YoY Change |
---|---|---|---|
Total Income | 1,847.05 | 1,896.48 | -2.6% |
Total Expenses | 1,799.77 | 1,797.30 | +0.1% |
PBT | 47.28 | 99.18 | -52.3% |
PAT | 38.53 | 82.77 | -53.4% |
PBT Margin | 2.56% | 5.23% | -267 bps |
A slight dip in revenue has translated into a massive 53% drop in profits. The reason is clear: costs are rising while sales are not. Let’s look at the key culprits on a YoY basis for Q2:
This has resulted in the Profit Before Tax (PBT) margin being more than halved, falling from 5.23% in Q2 FY24 to a mere 2.56% in Q2 FY25. The company is currently unable to pass on these significant cost increases to its customers, leading to a severe margin squeeze. Based on this performance, TOKYOPLAST fits the profile of a slow grower facing significant operational challenges.
Profits on paper are meaningless if they don’t translate into cash. The cash flow statement reveals a deteriorating situation.
Cash Flow from Operating Activities (CFO) for the first half of the year (H1 FY25) has collapsed.
Particulars (in ₹ Lakhs) | H1 FY25 | H1 FY24 |
---|---|---|
Net Cash from Operations | 229.13 | 1,889.11 |
The company generated nearly 90% less cash from its operations compared to the same period last year. The primary reasons are lower operating profit and a significant strain on working capital.
A key red flag is the surge in Trade Receivables (money owed by customers).
Sales for the first half grew only 8.15%, but receivables have shot up by over 18%. This suggests the company might be offering lenient credit terms to push sales, which is tying up crucial cash in the business. This is an unsustainable practice that can lead to liquidity issues if not managed carefully.
While the current performance is weak, the forward-looking economic context raises an even bigger concern. The provided economic outlook for August 2026 highlights a significant risk for export-oriented sectors: a 50% tariff on US exports.
Tokyo Plast operates in the “Plastic Thermoware Products” segment, a category often geared towards exports. While the provided documents don’t detail the company’s geographical sales mix, any significant exposure to the US market could pose a substantial threat. An already struggling company facing margin pressure and weak cash flows is ill-equipped to absorb a 50% tariff shock.
In conclusion, TOKYOPLAST’s Q2 FY25 results are disappointing. The company is classified as a slow grower under duress. Before considering an investment, it would be prudent to wait for signs of a turnaround, specifically in margin improvement, better working capital management, and a clear strategy to navigate potential global trade challenges.