Sula Vineyards Q1 FY26: Uncorking the Truth – Is India's Wine Giant Still a Growth Story?

Published: Aug 15, 2025 13:42

Sula Vineyards, India’s leading wine producer, recently unveiled its Q1 FY26 results, painting a picture of both resilience and near-term challenges. As an expert financial analyst, I’ve delved into the numbers and management commentary to bring you a comprehensive look at what’s truly brewing at Sula and what it means for its future earnings.

The Indian market, as we know, has been a tale of two halves. Q1 saw a strong rally in Nifty and Sensex, benefiting domestic-growth themes like banks and capital goods. However, July brought a correction, partly due to weak earnings and cautious guidance. Sula Vineyards, firmly rooted in India’s domestic consumption story, navigates these waters with a unique blend of a premium consumer brand and a thriving wine tourism business. The question is, how well did it weather the storm, and what’s its recipe for future growth?

Let’s uncork the details.

Sales Performance: A Tale of Two Segments

Sula’s Revenue from Operations for Q1 FY26 stood at ₹118.3 Crore, showing a headline decline of 7.9% year-on-year. However, a deeper look reveals the importance of adjusting for a one-time Wine Inventory Pricing Scheme (WIPS) unwinding benefit of ₹10.4 Crore in Q1 FY25. Excluding this, the adjusted YoY decline for Own Brands Sales was a more moderate 1.8%, while total adjusted revenue from operations was almost flat, up a marginal 0.2%. This adjustment is critical for a like-for-like comparison, indicating that the core business held relatively steady despite external pressures.

The management attributed the softness in sales to general urban demand slowdown and a temporary disruption in Maharashtra due to an excise duty hike on spirits. This led to “pre-stocking” of spirits by distributors, temporarily impacting wine placements in June.

Here’s how the key segments performed:

Category Revenue (Q1 FY26) (INR Cr) Q1 FY25 (Adjusted) (INR Cr) YoY Change % (Adjusted)
Own Brands 102.3 104.2 -1.8%
Wine Tourism 13.7 11.3 22.0%
Others 2.3 2.5 -8.0%
Total Revenue 118.3 118.0 0.2%

While Own Brands saw a slight adjusted dip, the standout performer was Wine Tourism, which clocked a robust 22.0% YoY growth. This segment continues to be a consistent growth engine, driven by increased visitor footfalls and healthy resort occupancy.

From a volume vs. price perspective, the company noted that it held its pricing, even amidst “indiscriminate and unsustainable” discounting by some competitors in the HoReCa segment. This indicates Sula’s commitment to protecting its brand premium and long-term margins, even if it means sacrificing some short-term volume in specific channels. The focus on premiumization within Own Brands is also a key growth driver, with Elite & Premium categories now accounting for 74.7% of Own Brand sales, up from 71.0% in Q1 FY25. This move towards higher-value products is a positive sign for future revenue and margin expansion.

Outlook: Management expects a return to healthier growth in the second half of FY26, as the temporary market disruptions subside and strategic initiatives bear fruit.

Key Business Metrics: Pouring into the Details

Beyond just sales, a few other metrics reveal Sula’s operational efficiency and strategic direction:

Earnings Performance: A Temporary Blip?

Sula’s profitability metrics faced significant pressure in Q1 FY26.

Particulars Q1 FY26 (INR Cr) Q1 FY25 (Adjusted) (INR Cr) YoY% (Adjusted)
Gross Profit 89.8 94.6 -5.1%
Operating EBITDA 18.3 23.5 -22.1%
PBT 2.6 9.0 -71.7%
PAT 1.9 6.8 -71.5%

The Operating EBITDA saw a 22.1% decline on an adjusted basis, while PAT fell by a sharper 71.5% (adjusted). The primary culprit for the gross margin compression and subsequent EBITDA drop was the COGS increase due to the wine sourcing model change mentioned earlier. However, it’s positive to note that employee costs and other expenses were well-managed, showing a slight decrease (1.9% and 0.9% respectively), indicating internal cost optimization efforts.

The significant drop in PBT and PAT is amplified by higher depreciation (up 6.7%) from past CapEx, and increased finance costs (up 5.7%) due to a marginal rise in average debt. Despite this, the debt-to-EBITDA ratio remains healthy at approximately 2x (trailing 12-month EBITDA).

How does good earnings performance look like? Generally, we want to see strong growth driven by revenue and cost efficiency. For Sula, a “fast grower” that has historically delivered impressive CAGRs (10% revenue, 25% Op EBITDA, 116% PAT over FY21-25), this quarter is a clear dip. However, the context of temporary disruptions and one-off accounting adjustments, coupled with management’s clear roadmap for margin recovery from Q3, suggests this could indeed be a temporary blip rather than a fundamental shift in its growth trajectory. The focus on operational efficiency and premiumization should support earnings going forward.

Working Capital & Capital Expenditure: Prudent Management

Working Capital: The company’s WIPS outstanding at the end of Q1 FY26 was ₹70 Crore, with ₹9.5 Crore accrued and ₹13 Crore received during the quarter. Management expects that lower capex and reduced inventory levels will help contain any further increase in debt this fiscal year, suggesting a focus on optimizing working capital. This is a positive sign for cash flow generation.

Capital Expenditure (CapEx): Sula Vineyards has been through a period of elevated CapEx in the past three years. However, management confirmed that major capital investments are largely complete. For FY26 and onwards, capex is expected to moderate significantly to around ₹35 Crore annually, down from ₹50-60 Crore per annum previously. This moderation, coupled with the asset-light model for new hospitality projects, indicates a shift towards capital efficiency and improved Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) in the coming quarters. The CapEx is primarily for growth (new resorts, tasting rooms) rather than just maintenance, which bodes well for future revenue streams.

Financing: Maintaining a Healthy Balance

Sula’s financing structure appears sound. While interest costs saw a marginal increase (5.7% YoY) due to slightly higher average debt, the debt-to-EBITDA ratio stands at a healthy ~2x. This indicates that the company’s leverage is manageable and within comfortable limits. The anticipated moderation in CapEx and improved working capital management are expected to prevent any significant increase in debt this fiscal year, supporting the company’s financial health and growth prospects.

Key Takeaways: Raising a Toast to the Future?

Sula Vineyards’ Q1 FY26 results present a nuanced picture. While headline numbers suggest a challenging quarter, adjusting for one-time benefits and understanding the temporary nature of certain headwinds paints a more resilient portrait.

Here’s what stands out for future earnings impact:

While Q1 FY26 was certainly a challenging start to the fiscal year for Sula’s profitability, the underlying trends – especially in wine tourism and premiumization – remain robust. With management’s clear plan to address the temporary challenges and a structurally positive outlook for the wine industry in India (especially with spirits becoming relatively more expensive), Sula Vineyards appears well-positioned to return to healthy operating profit growth in the latter half of FY26.

As financial analysts, we look for changes and future potential. Sula’s Q1 results, when adjusted and understood in context, signal a company navigating a tough period with strategic clarity and operational discipline. The current dip, if indeed temporary, could be seen as an opportune moment for a fast grower with strong long-term prospects.